51 points | by HelloUsername a day ago
10 comments
I feel like the title is a little overdramatic.
They’re not saying goodbye to the LHC, they’re upgrading it to have 10x the power.
I've read that CERN is storing more than 1 exabyte of collisions data these days (up from 600PB during the last long shutdown https://information-technology.web.cern.ch/sites/default/fil...). Not too shaby...
All using ZFS, too
uhoh, can only store 1000 of that dataset then. D:
In one pool, sure.
You can have more than one pool.
The typo that sometimes got through in official literature still makes me giggle
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acern.ch+%22large+hard...
Having done my little contribution to ATLAS TDAQ/HLT in the early 2000's, it is an interesting feeling to see the next steps taking shape.
Hopefully no sophons appear.
You don’t want an ocular alarm clock?
bad timing with the price of RAM and NAND
I feel like the title is a little overdramatic.
They’re not saying goodbye to the LHC, they’re upgrading it to have 10x the power.
I've read that CERN is storing more than 1 exabyte of collisions data these days (up from 600PB during the last long shutdown https://information-technology.web.cern.ch/sites/default/fil...). Not too shaby...
All using ZFS, too
uhoh, can only store 1000 of that dataset then. D:
In one pool, sure.
You can have more than one pool.
The typo that sometimes got through in official literature still makes me giggle
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acern.ch+%22large+hard...
Having done my little contribution to ATLAS TDAQ/HLT in the early 2000's, it is an interesting feeling to see the next steps taking shape.
Hopefully no sophons appear.
You don’t want an ocular alarm clock?
bad timing with the price of RAM and NAND