12 points | by connorboyle 18 hours ago
2 comments
I personally became suspicious of this paper four months ago, when I noticed that not a single one of the 210 participants in this study dropped out over the entire period, spanning 3 years. Feeling rather vindicated today!
When I read the study, immediately realised authors needed to read book statistics done wrong first.
I personally became suspicious of this paper four months ago, when I noticed that not a single one of the 210 participants in this study dropped out over the entire period, spanning 3 years. Feeling rather vindicated today!
When I read the study, immediately realised authors needed to read book statistics done wrong first.