I'm fatigued by this hyperbole and profanity, especially when written by an LLM. There is too much of this. Human-written or not it makes it very difficult for me to engage with. The sentiment is bad. Is building this better than building nothing?
Just because this is how things are does not it's how they should be. I'm very tired.
This site is for the lolz and obviously following the style set by the previous mf websites. I find it cathartic to laugh at the ridiculousness of the situation we are in, but also genuinely engage with the neck breaking pace of change we are all having to adjust to.
> Websites are broken by default. They used to be functional, fast, and accessible but ugly. Now they're slop, agentic, and on fire — but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left. Nobody's reading and you know it.
I’m upset if an LLM actually wrote this because this is p sick
Now Im suspecting if it's possible that VCs are part of the money loop, thus they are more than happy to fund as long as you pour enough of the funding back into the "AI ecosystem".
I'm fatigued by this hyperbole and profanity, especially when written by an LLM. There is too much of this. Human-written or not it makes it very difficult for me to engage with. The sentiment is bad. Is building this better than building nothing?
Just because this is how things are does not it's how they should be. I'm very tired.
This site is for the lolz and obviously following the style set by the previous mf websites. I find it cathartic to laugh at the ridiculousness of the situation we are in, but also genuinely engage with the neck breaking pace of change we are all having to adjust to.
And the LLM came up with some really funny lines
people were (rightfully) complaining about this kind of humor in 2019
https://dysfunctionalliteracy.com/2019/12/21/why-do-self-hel...
Yeah and these children who have never seen an em dash in their life.
Edgy CS grad vibes.
> Accessibility doesn't matter when the content is engineered to be inaccessible to thought.
Act sarcastic all you want, that's a killer line. You do care.
The headline on that section, "Static sites are for people who can still read", caught me off guard.
There are a few bangers in there
Out of curiosity, which AI persona should I attribute this writing to? Is this Claude?
Ya, it’s Claude
> Websites are broken by default. They used to be functional, fast, and accessible but ugly. Now they're slop, agentic, and on fire — but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left. Nobody's reading and you know it.
I’m upset if an LLM actually wrote this because this is p sick
Now Im suspecting if it's possible that VCs are part of the money loop, thus they are more than happy to fund as long as you pour enough of the funding back into the "AI ecosystem".
No BS. No Fluff.