This is the same bubble everyone is talking about for a while now. GPUs don’t last long enough to justify the infrastructure cost. But what if they exist for longer than current estimated life cycles? That’s always my question as someone using A80s and A100s in 2026.
Wondering the same, and in somewhat different terms.
And as models shrink in size yet go up in intelligence and performance, I'm finding ever more life in older hardware.
When I got my M1 Max in 2021, GPT-3 was about 1.5 years old and it was SOTA.
Yet, that machine is now able to run models that crush with gpt4, and even compete with o1 (SOTA from about 1.5 years ago.)
The idea that I could run something like that locally would have seemed absurd in 2021.
Yet, if somehow I'd had those local models in 2021 on the exact same hardware, I would have had, by far, the most powerful AI on the planet -- and that would have remained true for the next several years.
I'm also noticing that the ever-improving smaller models I can run on this machine are crossing the "good enough" threshold for ever more tasks by the month.
I just don't need a frontier model for every task.
I have an M4 Max 128 GB RAM now, but I still find plenty of tasks to delegate to the M1 Max machine.
I don't know how far this can go in the limit in terms of packing more intelligence into smaller models, but older hardware, if maintained well, seems like it's going to increase the value it can deliver in terms of "intelligence per watt-hour."
Hasnt exactly the opposite proven true? I thought they were actually appreciating in some cases? As token value goes up, old hardware becomes valuable.
Oh so some random user with no credentials, reputation, or real name just typed "do deep research on the AI infrastructure financial bubble and write a report" then submitted it to HN?
Why should I bother reading what may or may not be a pile of unverified hallucinations?
Yes, because it’s still hiding. I can hide from a clicker because they can’t see me. But if I make a noise, they might suck my face off and inject with spores.
This is the same bubble everyone is talking about for a while now. GPUs don’t last long enough to justify the infrastructure cost. But what if they exist for longer than current estimated life cycles? That’s always my question as someone using A80s and A100s in 2026.
Wondering the same, and in somewhat different terms.
And as models shrink in size yet go up in intelligence and performance, I'm finding ever more life in older hardware.
When I got my M1 Max in 2021, GPT-3 was about 1.5 years old and it was SOTA.
Yet, that machine is now able to run models that crush with gpt4, and even compete with o1 (SOTA from about 1.5 years ago.)
The idea that I could run something like that locally would have seemed absurd in 2021.
Yet, if somehow I'd had those local models in 2021 on the exact same hardware, I would have had, by far, the most powerful AI on the planet -- and that would have remained true for the next several years.
I'm also noticing that the ever-improving smaller models I can run on this machine are crossing the "good enough" threshold for ever more tasks by the month.
I just don't need a frontier model for every task.
I have an M4 Max 128 GB RAM now, but I still find plenty of tasks to delegate to the M1 Max machine.
I don't know how far this can go in the limit in terms of packing more intelligence into smaller models, but older hardware, if maintained well, seems like it's going to increase the value it can deliver in terms of "intelligence per watt-hour."
Hasnt exactly the opposite proven true? I thought they were actually appreciating in some cases? As token value goes up, old hardware becomes valuable.
> GPUs don’t last long enough to justify the infrastructure cost.
I'm CEO of an AMD neocloud. Confirming this is a myth.
https://x.com/HotAisle/status/2045181374030856300
Was this written by an LLM? It def reads like it!
Yes, it was created by a cool called Sourcery.
Sourcery Show HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47996426
The project is currently private, I'd love to have access to its source.
Oh so some random user with no credentials, reputation, or real name just typed "do deep research on the AI infrastructure financial bubble and write a report" then submitted it to HN?
Why should I bother reading what may or may not be a pile of unverified hallucinations?
An LLM who can’t format html so crams it in an ugly spread across a pdf.
Is it really hidden if it's hiding in plain sight?
Yes, because it’s still hiding. I can hide from a clicker because they can’t see me. But if I make a noise, they might suck my face off and inject with spores.
Not sure if that cultural touch point is as well known as you feel it is lol.
There's also an HTML version here: https://financial-ai-bubble.pagey.site