I am struggling to understand the need for this. If AI output is indistinguishable, that could mean -
1. It is as good as human output. For this to happen with the current state of AI, a human still needs to be an expert to guide and review. In this case, I don't think it hurts anyone to use AI.
2. It is worse than human output but the humans consuming it don't know any better. The AI reproduces successful patterns to produce books, paintings, music, films, instead of producing novel ideas/concepts that add to society. This is a deeper problem, and humans in pop culture have been doing it for years without AI. And besides art, bad outputs like vulnerable code or inaccurate text get detected naturally sooner or later.
I am struggling to understand the need for this. If AI output is indistinguishable, that could mean -
1. It is as good as human output. For this to happen with the current state of AI, a human still needs to be an expert to guide and review. In this case, I don't think it hurts anyone to use AI.
2. It is worse than human output but the humans consuming it don't know any better. The AI reproduces successful patterns to produce books, paintings, music, films, instead of producing novel ideas/concepts that add to society. This is a deeper problem, and humans in pop culture have been doing it for years without AI. And besides art, bad outputs like vulnerable code or inaccurate text get detected naturally sooner or later.
ironically, this could maybe sell for ai training.