If you are already running a VPS, the SSH -J option is useful if you don't want to expose your SSH to your home public address.
You create an SSH reverse tunnel (-R option) from a server in your home network to your remote VPS. This gives you a localhost port on your VPS to your server SSH port. Something like:
ssh -NT -R 2222:localhost:22 vpsuser@yourvps.com
From your laptop, use your your VPS address and localhost port in the -J option. Something like:
> Home internet in the 90s felt simple. You plugged into Ethernet, got an IPv4 address, and you could expose a service directly.
Maybe the 2000s, yes. This experience in the 90s was reserved for businesses and schools that could afford a T-carrier connection. The rest of us had dialup.
Even on dialup it was common to get a public IPv4 address, depending on what service. The service I had in like 95-98 didn't promise static IPs but I effectively got the same address for weeks at a time, I'm assuming due to whatever logic was mapping accounts to addresses. They also gave you access to a FreeBSD shell if you wanted to read email via elm or pine or the like, one of the first places I saw SSH!
It's bizarre to me that there is still so much effort spent on resisting IPv6 implementations, we were converting some industrial control networks to it almost 10 years ago and those organizations are basically defined by ancient equipment. Rather than byzantine v4 NAT coordination we mapped entire plants and substations to V6 addresses and put in 6to4 for the PLCs that were old enough to vote, so that multiple sites that all used the same 10.x.y.z blocks because of course they did could be routed together. Had V6 available from my house to pretty much anywhere I cared about in 2017.
If you are already running a VPS, the SSH -J option is useful if you don't want to expose your SSH to your home public address.
You create an SSH reverse tunnel (-R option) from a server in your home network to your remote VPS. This gives you a localhost port on your VPS to your server SSH port. Something like:
From your laptop, use your your VPS address and localhost port in the -J option. Something like: I only allow ssh key auth and only my laptop is trusted by my home server. The home server doesn't need to trust the VPS "jump server".Call me a tailscale simp, but since it was launched I honestly stopped caring about any of such issues.
They've built such an incredible product I actually feel guilty I pay absolutely nothing for it.
> Home internet in the 90s felt simple. You plugged into Ethernet, got an IPv4 address, and you could expose a service directly.
Maybe the 2000s, yes. This experience in the 90s was reserved for businesses and schools that could afford a T-carrier connection. The rest of us had dialup.
Even on dialup it was common to get a public IPv4 address, depending on what service. The service I had in like 95-98 didn't promise static IPs but I effectively got the same address for weeks at a time, I'm assuming due to whatever logic was mapping accounts to addresses. They also gave you access to a FreeBSD shell if you wanted to read email via elm or pine or the like, one of the first places I saw SSH!
I had dialup with a static IP and inbound access to listening ports.
New fiber provider across town does CGNAT and no IPv6.
I guess that works for most people except gamers and people who get rate limited because of the actions of others.
Article is correct, IPv4 didn’t die hard.
It's bizarre to me that there is still so much effort spent on resisting IPv6 implementations, we were converting some industrial control networks to it almost 10 years ago and those organizations are basically defined by ancient equipment. Rather than byzantine v4 NAT coordination we mapped entire plants and substations to V6 addresses and put in 6to4 for the PLCs that were old enough to vote, so that multiple sites that all used the same 10.x.y.z blocks because of course they did could be routed together. Had V6 available from my house to pretty much anywhere I cared about in 2017.
[delayed]